Is pro cycling too hard?
David L. Stanley writes some great stuff for our friends at BikeRaceInfo.
I think we share what the Giro d’Italia folks call amore infinito
for La Corsa Rosa and I’d love to buy him a spritz on our beautiful
Piazza Duomo should he ever visit Sicily. But some of his recent 2023
Giro d’Italia: Rest Day One is way off the back.
I agree 100% about the dangers of cars driven in the race
caravan but David claims the UCI (and I assume by implication RCS, organizers
of the
Giro) views the riders as
far-too-disposable assets,
referring to the bad weather the Giro (and Italy) has faced recently. He points
out that baseball games stop when it rains and implies that bicycle races should
be held only on dry roads as well. He then goes on to claim motorsports don’t
run in the rain, ignoring that MOTOGP - the fastest, scariest things on two
wheels regularly DO race on wet tracks, their amazing rain tires allowing lean
angles that astound anyone who has ever ridden a two-wheeler of any kind.
Is racing bicycles in this weather
really that dangerous? Where he lives in Michigan it’s likely far different
than in Italy. I lived for two decades in Iowa so I think I know what he’s writing
about when it comes to the danger of thunderstorms and being struck by
lightning where he lives, but I’ve also lived off and on in Italy for decades,
including full-time in Sicily since late in 2018.
There’s no argument about the
dangers of riding in thunderstorms anywhere, especially on the plains in midwestern
USA, but in Italy, rain doesn’t always come with thunder and lightning – it’s
just rain. At the Giro’s stage 5 this year my rain-jacket started leaking after
being at both the start and finish in an almost constant drizzle. It also
rained for part of stage 6, but just like stage 5 I never heard any claps of
thunder or saw streaks of lightning, so stopping or shortening a stage even because
of a serious downpour strikes me as an overreaction.
Same with wet, slippery roads.
Modern road bikes are all equipped with disc brakes, which we are told provide
secure, reliable braking in all conditions though the gawdawful squawking and
squealing does seem the price one pays. Tires have also never been better they
say, with road tubeless and specially crafted rubber compounds that promise
secure grip in all conditions. If the forecast is for rain all day, wouldn’t
the team mechanic fit their best rain tires since they no longer have to worry
about tubular glue needing overnight to set up? These are the same folks I used
to see laying a thick bead of white lithium grease onto a chain as bikes
were prepped for a rainy stage, so maybe it’s even time for that not-so-aero
but more forgiving bike or wheelset while they’re at it when bad weather is an
all-day forecast? It’s not like spare bikes are unavailable should conditions
change!
Then there’s the cold and rain
itself. David doesn’t dwell on this too much, perhaps he’s just as aware of the
magical properties attributed to modern cold/wet weather cycling gear sold at
astronomical prices as I am? The days of sodden wool jerseys and vinyl rain capes
that might keep the rain off while acting like a sauna inside are long gone, so
why does a temperature still on the plus side of freezing at the highest
peak on the days route cause so much whining and gnashing of teeth?
But more important than all
this is what would have happened in 1910 if Alphonse Steines’ response to
LeTour’s Henri Desgrange was:
“Sorry old chap, we can’t bring the Tour over the
Pyrenees. The roads are awful, there’s no cell phone coverage, the director’s car
video screens will have no pictures and some people told me there are wild
bears around. And it rains here…a lot! The
UCI and the rider’s union will never go for it.”
What would have happened if
the UCI’s weather protocol was enforced that same year at Milano Sanremo, where
only 4 riders of 63 entrants finished? Or in 1956 on Monte Bondone with Charly
Gaul? 1988 on the snowy Passo Gavia with Andy Hampsten? 2013 on Tre Cime di
Lavaredo with Vincenzo Nibali?
We know what happened at
LeTour 1996 when Riis raced to victory on the shortened stage where all the major
climbs were driven over with riders in the cars except for the final 46
kilometers. We know what happened at the Giro with the 2020 Abbiategrasso farce
– one shortened not by any real danger, more that the riders were just tired
and didn’t want to ride in the rain. Is this the future of pro cycling?
Most cycling TV broadcasts
feature some historical video, usually of heroic exploits done by legendary
riders of the past, quite often in atrocious weather conditions, something road
cyclists have been enduring since… there was road cycling. Where will tomorrow’s
heroes, legends and exploits come from if weather protocols prevent racing
under anything other than sunny skies with perfect road conditions?
Update: Friday's stage was supposed to be 208 kilometers into Switzerland via the fearsome Gran San Bernardo pass with a climb of Croix de Coeur and finish atop Crans Montana. A week before, Gran San Bernardo was scrapped over concerns about the road conditions on the descent, then the morning of the race the riders threatened a strike over being forced to ride in terrible conditions. The organizers caved, shortening the stage to just 80 kilometers, reminding many of the 1996 Tour farce. Many roadside fans gave the riders (inside their buses) a middle-finger salute as they drove out of Italy.
Amazingly, reports of the road conditions on the descent (from the tunnel exit, the route they would have taken once GS Bernardo itself was scrapped) revealed nothing in the way of dangerous conditions. Nor were there dangerous conditions on the rest of the route.
A lot like this from not too long ago? Will this ever stop?
In Zio Lorenzo's opinion the riders and their representatives were revealed to be whining babies who want the UCI's weather protocol changed to: "When the riders decide they don't want to ride for any reason, the stage shall be shortened or canceled. Nobody shall argue with them."
OK, but perhaps no more television images of the old days when it was real RACERS racing in the weather conditions they were dealt should be used to promote the sport, since they find just a forecast of bad weather unpleasant enough to threaten a strike?
David Stanley wrote a (sort of, I guess?) retort to Zio's post here. Rather than reply tit-for-tat to something that's far from one of his best columns for BikeRaceInfo here's the link so you can read it yourself. Rather than "throat-punch" him as he suggests for people like Zio I'd still buy him that spritz on the piazza, but this piece is just wrong, wrong, wrong as it seems clear he wants the Giro to be the INDY 500, "a sunny day in May affair" exclusively. Zio thinks that would be a tragedy for road cycling far worse than someone hitting the deck on a wet road or getting really, really cold.
Sorry David.
